Comments on: Unexpected and Unpleasant Surprises (The MIT 5k dataset 9) http://www.moderncolorworkflow.com/blog/unexpected-and-unpleasant-surprises-the-mit-5k-dataset-9 Latest color correction book by Dan Margulis Fri, 06 Feb 2026 17:32:50 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.35 By: Dan Margulis http://www.moderncolorworkflow.com/blog/unexpected-and-unpleasant-surprises-the-mit-5k-dataset-9#comment-89553 Wed, 11 Sep 2019 20:01:46 +0000 http://www.moderncolorworkflow.com/?p=1410#comment-89553 Lance, Thanks. The post is now corrected.

]]> By: Lance http://www.moderncolorworkflow.com/blog/unexpected-and-unpleasant-surprises-the-mit-5k-dataset-9#comment-89539 Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:41:51 +0000 http://www.moderncolorworkflow.com/?p=1410#comment-89539 Dan,

In your first two example images here, the image you’ve called out as #5054-default appears to be #2764 in the dataset. The caption there also calls the first image #4897-default but is correct in following examples as #4987.

]]> By: ANTONIO BIGGIO http://www.moderncolorworkflow.com/blog/unexpected-and-unpleasant-surprises-the-mit-5k-dataset-9#comment-88607 Tue, 03 Sep 2019 20:35:16 +0000 http://www.moderncolorworkflow.com/?p=1410#comment-88607 In this article you explain very well what I’ve found in many of my image that sometimes convinced me to leave the ppw: although the ppw workflow is correct the result are not very attractive like a normal workflow, also if the image have more color variations and contrast.
Well done as always. Thank you so much for the time and the idea that you give us for free.

]]>