<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Often is PPW Superior? (The MIT 5k dataset 6)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moderncolorworkflow.com/blog/how-often-is-ppw-superior-the-mit-5k-dataset-6/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moderncolorworkflow.com/blog/how-often-is-ppw-superior-the-mit-5k-dataset-6</link>
	<description>Latest color correction book by Dan Margulis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 17:32:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.35</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk West</title>
		<link>http://www.moderncolorworkflow.com/blog/how-often-is-ppw-superior-the-mit-5k-dataset-6#comment-65757</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirk West]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moderncolorworkflow.com/?p=1258#comment-65757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All in all a fair and truthful summary imho. I use PPW extensively on my own images, which consist of mainly Birdlife, some wildlife, flowers, occasionally faces and landscapes. I also retouch some other photographers work from all types of cameras. Recently completed retouching botched work of a wedding photographer and retouched some 150 images for a publication. My summary PPW never once failed me and always assisted me in producing more than satisfactory results. I still regard myself as a student of PPW and have read the MPCW and LAB book more than once or even twice. Thanks to these books and Dan&#039;s ongoing interest and involvement in the subject my photographic experience as a whole has been enriched immensely. Thanks Kirk West]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All in all a fair and truthful summary imho. I use PPW extensively on my own images, which consist of mainly Birdlife, some wildlife, flowers, occasionally faces and landscapes. I also retouch some other photographers work from all types of cameras. Recently completed retouching botched work of a wedding photographer and retouched some 150 images for a publication. My summary PPW never once failed me and always assisted me in producing more than satisfactory results. I still regard myself as a student of PPW and have read the MPCW and LAB book more than once or even twice. Thanks to these books and Dan&#8217;s ongoing interest and involvement in the subject my photographic experience as a whole has been enriched immensely. Thanks Kirk West</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
